Research Article: Effect of nanoemulsion-fish protein hydrolysate supplementation on selected physicochemical parameters of yogurt
|
N Vakili1 , M Ataee *1 , S Kakoolaki2 , H Ahari3 , A Ghorbanzadeh4  |
1- Department of food hygiene, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran 2- Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute, Agriculture Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran 3- Department of Food Science and Technology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran 4- Department of Aquatic Health and Disease, Veterinary Science Faculty, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran |
|
Abstract: (1225 Views) |
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the physico-chemical criteria of yogurt fortified with fish protein hydrolysate (FPH) obtained from Fresh Abu mullet (Planiliza abu) fish weighing 40 g during 21-day refrigeration. A hundred milliliters of final milk were inoculated with starter culture, and fermented for 4-5 hours until the pH reached to 4.6. The yogurts were divided in two groups in triplicate and each group was prepared in triplicate. Yogurts supplemented with nanoencapsulated hydrolysates exhibited a slight reduction in pH and augmented acidity particularly up to three weeks of refrigeration. The pH of nanoemulsion-FPH yogurt was initially 4.52 and reached 4.01 in third week with a significant difference (p<0.05) compared with that of the control at the same time (3.80). The pH value of the fortified yogurt showed acceptable limit on day 7 (4.35) but it was remarkably decreased on day 14 (4.19, p<0.5). The upmost and the least values of viscosity of nano-FPH yogurt samples were respectively 4187.3 and 4046.6 (cps) on days 1 and 21. The viscosity values of control were ranged from 3716.0 to 4042.0, respectively in 21 and 1 days of refrigeration. Moreover, the maximum and minimum water holding capacity (WHC) value of nano-FPH yogurt samples 92.5% and 86.2%, respectively on days 1 and 21. It is concluded that the incorporation of the FPH in the form of nanoencapsulation offered superior physico-chemical advantages than those of control yogurt samples.
|
|
Keywords: Yogurt, Nanoemulsion, Fish protein hydrolysate, Physico-Chemical parameters |
|
Full-Text [PDF 440 kb]
(447 Downloads)
|
Type of Study: Original research papers |
Subject:
Aquaculture and Health management Received: 2022/08/12 | Accepted: 2022/11/1 | Published: 2022/11/11
|
|
|
|
|
References |
1. Agarry, I. E., Ding, D., Cai, T., Wu, Z., Huang, P., Kan, J. and Chen, K., 2023. Inulin-whey protein as efficient vehicle carrier system for chlorophyll: Optimization, characterization, and functional food application. Journal of Food Science, In press. [ DOI:10.1111/1750-3841.16703] [ PMID] 2. Ahmad, I., Hao, M., Li, Y., Jianyou, Z., Yuting, D. and Lyu, F., 2022. Fortification of yogurt with bioactive functional foods and ingredients and associated challenges-A review. Trends in food science & technology, 129, 558-580. [ DOI:10.1016/j.tifs.2022.11.003] 3. Ayati, S., Eun, J. B., Atoub, N. and Mirzapour‐Kouhdasht, A., 2022. Functional yogurt fortified with fish collagen‐derived bioactive peptides: Antioxidant capacity, ACE and DPP‐IV inhibitory. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 46(1), e16208. [ DOI:10.1111/jfpp.16208] 4. Barkallah, M., Dammak, M., Louati, I., Hentati, F., Hadrich, B., Mechichi, T., Ayadi, M. A., Fendri, I., Attia, H. and Abdelkafi, S., 2017. Effect of Spirulina platensis fortification on physicochemical, textural, antioxidant and sensory properties of yogurt during fermentation and storage. LWT, 84, 323-330. [ DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2017.05.071] 5. Bayarri, S., Carbonell, I., Barrios, E. X. and Costell, E., 2010. Acceptability of yogurt and yogurt‐like products: Influence of product information and consumer characteristics and preferences. Journal of Sensory Studies, 25, 171-189. [ DOI:10.1111/j.1745-459X.2009.00271.x] 6. Bhat, S. V., Deva, A. M. and Amin, T., 2018. Physicochemical and textural properties of yogurt fortified with psyllium (Plantago ovate) husk. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 42(2), e13425. [ DOI:10.1111/jfpp.13425] 7. Bondia-Pons, I., Molto-Puigmarti, C., Castellote, A. and Lopez-Sabater, M., 2007. Determination of conjugated linoleic acid in human plasma by fast gas chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A, 1157(1-2), 422-429. [ DOI:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.05.020] [ PMID] 8. Deshwal, G. K., Tiwari, S., Kumar, A., Raman, R. K. and Kadyan, S., 2021. Review on factors affecting and control of post-acidification in yoghurt and related products. Trends in food science & technology, 109, 499-512. [ DOI:10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.057] 9. El-Kholy, W. M., Soliman, T. N. and Darwish, A. M. G., 2019. Evaluation of date palm pollen (Phoenix dactylifera L.) encapsulation, impact on the nutritional and functional properties of fortified yoghurt. PloS one, 14(10), 1-23. [ DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0222789] [ PMID] [ PMCID] 10. El‐Sayed, S. M., El‐Sayed, H. S., Elgamily, H. M. and Youssef, A. M., 2022. Preparation and evaluation of yogurt fortified with probiotics jelly candy enriched with grape seeds extract nanoemulsion. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 46(7), e16713. [ DOI:10.1111/jfpp.16713] 11. Farvin, K. S., Andersen, L. L., Nielsen, H. H., Jacobsen, C., Jakobsen, G., Johansson, I. and Jessen, F., 2014. Antioxidant activity of Cod (Gadus morhua) protein hydrolysates: In vitro assays and evaluation in 5% fish oil-in-water emulsion. Food chemistry, 149, 326-334. [ DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.03.075] [ PMID] 12. Frye, C. P. and Kilara, A. 2015. Regulations for product standards and labeling: John Wiley & Sons. [ DOI:10.1002/9781118810279.ch06] 13. Gheshlaghi, S. P., Khaledabad, M. A., Nikoo, M., Regenstein, J. M. and Gavlighi, H. A., 2021. Impact of sturgeon gelatin hydrolysates (SGH) on physicochemical and microbiological properties of fat-free set-type yogurt. LWT, 148, 111665. [ DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111665] 14. Hemker, A. K., Nguyen, L. T., Karwe, M. and Salvi, D., 2020. Effects of pressure-assisted enzymatic hydrolysis on functional and bioactive properties of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) by-product protein hydrolysates. LWT, 122, 109003. [ DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2019.109003] 15. Huang, Z., Huang, L., Xing, G., Xu, X., Tu, C. and Dong, M., 2020. Effect of co-fermentation with lactic acid bacteria and K. marxianus on physicochemical and sensory properties of goat milk. Foods. 2020; 9 (3). Foods, 9(3), 1-14. [ DOI:10.3390/foods9030299] [ PMID] [ PMCID] 16. Ishak, N. and Sarbon, N., 2018. A review of protein hydrolysates and bioactive peptides deriving from wastes generated by fish processing. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 11, 2-16. [ DOI:10.1007/s11947-017-1940-1] 17. Jaster, H., Arend, G. D., Rezzadori, K., Chaves, V. C., Reginatto, F. H. and Petrus, J. C. C., 2018. Enhancement of antioxidant activity and physicochemical properties of yogurt enriched with concentrated strawberry pulp obtained by block freeze concentration. Food Research International, 104, 119-125. [ DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.006] [ PMID] 18. Jones, P. J. and Jew, S., 2007. Functional food development: concept to reality. Trends in food science & technology, 18(7), 387-390. [ DOI:10.1016/j.tifs.2007.03.008] 19. Jorfipour, M., Keivany, Y., Paykan-Heyrati, F. and Ghafoori, Z., 2022. Feeding indices of Planiliza abu (Heckel, 1843) in Karun River, Southwestern Iran. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 20(4), 693-700. [ DOI:10.22124/CJES.2022.5721] 20. Kailasapathy, K. and Chin, J., 2000. Survival and therapeutic potential of probiotic organisms with reference to Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp. Immunology and cell biology, 78(1), 80-88. [ DOI:10.1046/j.1440-1711.2000.00886.x] [ PMID] 21. Lima, K. O., da Rocha, M., Alemán, A., López-Caballero, M. E., Tovar, C. A., Gómez-Guillén, M. C., Montero, P. and Prentice, C., 2021. Yogurt fortification by the addition of microencapsulated stripped weakfish (Cynoscion guatucupa) protein hydrolysate. Antioxidants, 10(10), 1567. [ DOI:10.3390/antiox10101567] [ PMID] [ PMCID] 22. Lima, K. O., de Quadros, C. d. C., da Rocha, M., de Lacerda, J. T. J. G., Juliano, M. A., Dias, M., Mendes, M. A. and Prentice, C., 2019. Bioactivity and bioaccessibility of protein hydrolyzates from industrial byproducts of Stripped weakfish (Cynoscion guatucupa). LWT, 111, 408-413. [ DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2019.05.043] 23. Ma, Y.-S., Zhao, H.-J. and Zhao, X.-H., 2019. Comparison of the effects of the alcalase-hydrolysates of caseinate, and of fish and bovine gelatins on the acidification and textural features of set-style skimmed yogurt-type products. Foods, 8(10), 1-11. [ DOI:10.3390/foods8100501] [ PMID] [ PMCID] 24. Madora, E. P., Takalani, T. K. and Mashau, M. E., 2016. Physicochemical, microbiological and sensory properties of low fat yoghurt fortified with carrot powder. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 9(1), 118-124. [ DOI:10.3965/j.ijabe.20160901.1874] 25. Mousavi, M., Heshmati, A., Daraei Garmakhany, A., Vahidinia, A. and Taheri, M., 2019. Texture and sensory characterization of functional yogurt supplemented with flaxseed during cold storage. Food science & nutrition, 7(3), 907-917. [ DOI:10.1002/fsn3.805] [ PMID] [ PMCID] 26. Nimse, S. B. and Pal, D., 2015. Free radicals, natural antioxidants, and their reaction mechanisms. RSC Advances, 5(35), 27986-28006. [ DOI:10.1039/C4RA13315C] 27. Ozturkoglu-Budak, S., Akal, C. and Yetisemiyen, A., 2016. Effect of dried nut fortification on functional, physicochemical, textural, and microbiological properties of yogurt. Journal of dairy science, 99(11), 8511-8523. [ DOI:10.3168/jds.2016-11217] [ PMID] 28. Raftani Amiri, Z., Safari, R. and Bakhshandeh, T., 2016. Functional properties of fish protein hydrolysates from Cuttlefish (Sepia pharaonis) muscle produced by two commercial enzymes. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences, 15(4), 1485-1499. 29. Rezaei, R., Yeganeh, S., Amiri, Z. and Safari, R., 2020. A survey on functional properties of protein hydrolysate from Hyrcanian goby (Neogobius caspius) by application of flavourzyme enzyme and its effect on quality of low-fat yogurt. Journal of Innovation in Food Science and Technology, 12(3), 21-36. 30. Santillán-Urquiza, E., Méndez-Rojas, M. Á. and Vélez-Ruiz, J. F., 2017. Fortification of yogurt with nano and micro sized calcium, iron and zinc, effect on the physicochemical and rheological properties. LWT, 80, 462-469. [ DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2017.03.025] 31. Tseng, A. and Zhao, Y., 2013. Wine grape pomace as antioxidant dietary fibre for enhancing nutritional value and improving storability of yogurt and salad dressing. Food chemistry, 138(1), 356-365. [ DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.09.148] [ PMID] 32. Zhou, Y., Yue, W., Luo, Y., Luo, Q., Liu, S., Chen, H., Qin, W. and Zhang, Q., 2022. Preparation and stability characterization of soybean protein isolate/sodium alginate complexes-based nanoemulsions using high-pressure homogenization. LWT, 154, 112607. [ DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112607]
|
|
Vakili N, Ataee M, Kakoolaki S, Ahari H, Ghorbanzadeh A. Research Article: Effect of nanoemulsion-fish protein hydrolysate supplementation on selected physicochemical parameters of yogurt. Sustainable Aquaculture. Health. Management. J. 2022; 8 (2) :66-76 URL: http://ijaah.ir/article-1-268-en.html
|