<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>Sustainable Aquaculture and Health Management Journal</title>
<title_fa>نشریه آبزی پروری پایدار و مدیریت بهداشتی</title_fa>
<short_title>Sustainable Aquaculture. Health. Management. J.</short_title>
<subject>Agriculture</subject>
<web_url>http://ijaah.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2821-1383</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2821-1383</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.61186/ijaah</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1398</year>
	<month>8</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2019</year>
	<month>11</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>5</volume>
<number>2</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Inhibitory activity of native probiotic Bacillus vallismortis IS03 against pathogenic Vibrio harveyi under in vitro and in vivo conditions in Litopenaeus vannamei</title>
	<subject_fa>Bacterial Disease</subject_fa>
	<subject>Bacterial Disease</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Original research papers</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;An excellent alternative for chemical antimicrobial agents to prevent disease in the shrimp aquaculture is the application of effective probiotics. The present study was evaluated the effect of &lt;em&gt;Bacillus vallismortis&lt;/em&gt; IS03 as a native probiotic, isolated from digestive tract of &lt;em&gt;Litopenaeus vannamei&lt;/em&gt; on pathogenic &lt;em&gt;Vibrio harveyi&lt;/em&gt; under &lt;em&gt;in vitro&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;in vivo&lt;/em&gt; circumstances. Co-cultivation of &lt;em&gt;V. harveyi&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;B. vallismortis&lt;/em&gt; showed significantly (P&lt;0.05) decreased the growth of &lt;em&gt;V. harveyi&lt;/em&gt; in the treatment groups compared to the control. Cell-free extracts of &lt;em&gt;B. vallismortis&lt;/em&gt; IS03 exhibited more appropriate antibacterial effects on replication of &lt;em&gt;V. harveyi&lt;/em&gt;. The highest and lowest inhibitory effects were respectively shown in10&lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt; and 10&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt; CFU ml&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; of &lt;em&gt;B. vallismortis&lt;/em&gt; IS03 cell-free extracts. The probiotic potential of &lt;em&gt;B. vallismortis&lt;/em&gt; IS03 was assessed through the groups of control and the experiments 10&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt;, 10&lt;sup&gt;7&lt;/sup&gt; and 10&lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt; CFU ml&lt;sup&gt;-1 &lt;/sup&gt;salt water once every 3 days from zoea1 process to end point of the study.&amp;nbsp;The probiotic potential of &lt;em&gt;B. vallismortis&lt;/em&gt; IS03 was assessed through the groups of control and the experiments 10&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt;, 10&lt;sup&gt;7&lt;/sup&gt; and 10&lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt; CFU ml&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; salt water once every 3 days from zoea1 process to end point of the study. Shrimp survival was determined after 10 days of challenge with &lt;em&gt;V. harveyi&lt;/em&gt; &amp;nbsp;at 10&lt;sup&gt; 5&lt;/sup&gt; CFU ml&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; (for the first 5 days) and 10&lt;sup&gt; 7&lt;/sup&gt; CFU ml&lt;sup&gt;-1 &lt;/sup&gt;&amp;nbsp;(for the second 5 days).The cumulative mortality in the treatment with 10&lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt; CFU ml&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; of &amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;B. vallismortis&lt;/em&gt; IS03 reached 11.88% compared to 40.63% in the control group. At the end of the trial, total bacterial counts on TSA, total &lt;em&gt;vibrio&lt;/em&gt; on TCBS were significantly (P&lt;0.05) lower in the 10&lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt; CFU ml&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; treatment group. &lt;em&gt;Bacillus&lt;/em&gt; counts on MYP agar in the treatment groups were significantly (P&lt;0.05) higher than the control, also total bacterial counts was lower in the treatment groups, while, no &lt;em&gt;vibrio &lt;/em&gt;were grown in the muscle tissues of shrimp treated with probiotics. It is concluded that 10&lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt; CFU ml&lt;sup&gt;-1 &lt;/sup&gt;of probiotic, &lt;em&gt;B. vallismortis&lt;/em&gt; IS03 has antibacterial efficiency against pathogenic &lt;em&gt;V. harveyi&lt;/em&gt; at &lt;em&gt;in vitro&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;in vivo&lt;/em&gt; conditions.&lt;span dir=&quot;RTL&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Probiotic, Bacillus vallismortis, Litopenaeus vannamei, Vibrio harveyi</keyword>
	<start_page>54</start_page>
	<end_page>66</end_page>
	<web_url>http://ijaah.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-274-1&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>M</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Mahjoub</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>m_mahj2013@yahoo.com</email>
	<code>10031947532846002342</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846002342</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Iranian Fisheries Sciences Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>M</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Mirbakhsh</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>maryam.mirbakhsh@gmail.com</email>
	<code>10031947532846002343</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846002343</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Iranian Fisheries Sciences Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>M</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Afsharnasab</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>mafsharnasab@yahoo.com</email>
	<code>10031947532846002344</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846002344</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Iranian Fisheries Sciences Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>S</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Kakoolaki</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>bsh443@yahoo.com</email>
	<code>10031947532846002345</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846002345</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Iranian Fisheries Sciences Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>S</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Hosseinzadeh</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>cd_da@ymail.com</email>
	<code>10031947532846002346</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846002346</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Food Hygiene, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
